Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

< Back to Article

Table 1.

Mean development time of DBM life stages at different constant temperatures.

More »

Table 1 Expand

Fig 1.

Development rates of immature stages of DBM: Egg (a), larva (b) and pupa (c).

Blue dots are the observed means ± SE, the solid red line represents the selected model output, while the dotted blue lines represent the upper and lower 95% confidence limits. Bars represent standard deviations.

More »

Fig 1 Expand

Fig 2.

Temperature-dependent mortalities of immature life stages of DBM: Egg (a), larva (b) and pupa (c).

Blue dots are the observed means, the solid red line represents the selected model output, while dotted blue lines represent the upper and lower 95% confidence intervals of selected models.

More »

Fig 2 Expand

Table 2.

Lifespan and fecundity of DBM at constant temperatures.

More »

Table 2 Expand

Fig 3.

Temperature-dependent total egg production (a) and age-related cumulative proportion of egg production (b).

Age of the females at 50% oviposition is indicated. Dots represent data points. The upper and lower 95% confidence intervals of the model are indicated.

More »

Fig 3 Expand

Table 3.

Summary of the life table of DBM at different constant temperatures.

More »

Table 3 Expand

Fig 4.

Population growth parameters of DBM estimated over a range of five constant temperatures.

rm, intrinsic rate of natural increase; Ro, net reproduction rate; GRR, gross reproduction rate; GT, mean generation time; λ, finite rate of increase; and DT, doubling time.

More »

Fig 4 Expand

Table 4.

Estimated population growth parameters of DBM at different constant temperatures.

More »

Table 4 Expand

Table 5.

Validation of the developed phenology model through comparison of observed and simulated population growth parameters of DBM life stages.

More »

Table 5 Expand

Table 6.

Changes between the current (2013) and future (2055) maximum and minimum temperatures on selected farms along Mt. Kilimanjaro transect and the Taita hills transect.

All current, future and their differences in temperatures were recorded in degrees centigrade (°C) and altitude in metres above sea level (masl).

More »

Table 6 Expand

Fig 5.

Changes in the establishment, abundance and population growth rates of DBM along altitudinal gradients of Mt. Kilimanjaro and Taita hills.

Establishment risk indices (ERI) of Mt. Kilimanjaro (a) and Taita hills (d); Generation indices (GI) of Mt. Kilimanjaro (b) and Taita hills (e); and Activity indices (AI) of Mt. Kilimanjaro (c) and Taita hills (f) *KisangeB = Kisangesangeni B, KisaMadukani = Kisangesangeni Madukani.

More »

Fig 5 Expand

Fig 6.

Changed establishment, abundance and population growth rates across climate change scenarios of Mt. Kilimanjaro.

Current 2013 distribution and abundance of DBM: (a) ERI, (b) GI and (c) AI; future 2055 distribution and abundance of DBM: (d) ERI, (e) GI and (f) AI. Absolute change in distribution and abundance between current and future scenarios: (g) ERI, (h) GI and (i) AI. ERI = Establishment Risk Index, GI = Generation Index and AI = Activity Index. *KisangeB = Kisangesangeni B, KisaMadukani = Kisangesangeni Madukani.

More »

Fig 6 Expand

Fig 7.

Altered establishment, abundance and population growth rates across climate change scenarios of Taita hills.

Current 2013 distribution and abundance of DBM: (a) ERI, (b) GI and (c) AI; future 2055 distribution and abundance of DBM: (d) ERI, (e) GI and (f) AI. Absolute change in distribution and abundance between current and future scenarios: (g) ERI, (h) GI and (i) AI. ERI = Establishment Risk Index, GI = Generation Index and AI = Activity Index.

More »

Fig 7 Expand