Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

< Back to Article

Fig 1.

The Liverpool ADR Causality Assessment Tool (LCAT), with numbering of questions as used in this manuscript.

* Yes or unassessable. Unassessable refers to situations where the medicine is administered on one occasion (e.g. vaccine), the patient receives intermittent therapy (e.g. chemotherapy), or is on medication which cannot be stopped (e.g. immunosuppressants). †Examples of objective evidence: positive laboratory investigations of the causal ADR mechanism (not those merely confirming the adverse reaction), supra-therapeutic drug levels, good evidence of dose-dependent relationship with toxicity in the patient. LCAT reproduced under a Creative Commons Attribution License. Source: Gallagher [4].

More »

Fig 1 Expand

Table 1.

Pairwise distribution of outcomes, when using the WHO-UMC system.

More »

Table 1 Expand

Table 2.

Pairwise distribution of outcomes, when using the LCAT.

More »

Table 2 Expand

Table 3.

Exact agreement (EA), extreme disagreement (ED), unweighted pairwise Cohen kappa (κ) and linearly-weighted pairwise Cohen kappa (κw) for each of six rater-pairs, using two different causality assessment methods.

More »

Table 3 Expand

Table 4.

Distribution of raters’ responses to LCAT questions.

More »

Table 4 Expand