Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

< Back to Article

Fig 1.

The type specimens of A. gravesii and A. lianxianense.

A: the whole view. B and C: the tracings of the type specimen of A. gravesii and A. lianxianense. D and E: the enlarged type specimens of A. gravesii and A. lianxianense.

More »

Fig 1 Expand

Table 1.

Main morphological characters of the five species in series Gravesiana according to Shing and Wu (1990).

More »

Table 1 Expand

Fig 2.

The type specimens of A. chienii and A. mariesii.

Left: A. chienii; right: A. mariesii.

More »

Fig 2 Expand

Fig 3.

The distribution and collection sites of different populations in the series Gravesiana.

More »

Fig 3 Expand

Fig 4.

Strict consensus tree of five maximally parsimonious trees for Chinense Adiantum, generating from atpA, atpB, rbcL, trnL-F and rps4-trnS sequences (tree length = 5,052 steps, CI = 0.6033, RI = 0.9198).

The bootstrap values were shown above the lines, and the Bayesian posterior probabilities were shown below the lines. Series classifications of Lin (1980) about Adiantum were labeled in columns. For G1-3, GDY1-1, JW2-8, GJK2-2, …., front alphabets are the short names of different populations of taxa, and the latter numbers represent single individuals as shown in S1 Table.

More »

Fig 4 Expand

Fig 5.

Strict consensus tree of six maximally parsimonious trees for series Gravesiana obtained from atpA, atpB, rbcL, trnL-F, rps4-trnS and matK sequences (tree length = 1,384 steps, CI = 0.8779, RI = 0. 0.9609).

The bootstrap values were shown above the lines, and the Bayesian posterior probabilities were shown below the lines. Nine clades were labeled in columns and their own morphological characters were stated at right. For G1-3, GDY1-1, JW2-8, GJK2-2, …., front alphabets are the short names of different populations of taxa and the latter numbers represent single individuals as shown in S1 Table.

More »

Fig 5 Expand

Fig 6.

Twelve character optimisation over the 6-combined markers phylogeny tree (atpA, atpB, rbcL, trnL-F, rps4-trnS and matK), which were inferred by the Mesquite v. 2.71, using maximum parsimony.

More »

Fig 6 Expand

Table 2.

Morphological characters of each clade concluded from the measured data.

More »

Table 2 Expand

Fig 7.

SEM observation of series Gravesiana.

Clade A: B1, B2, B10 and B11; Clade B: x4, x5; Clade C: c10, c11; Clade H: c1-c8; Clade I: J1, J2.

More »

Fig 7 Expand

Table 3.

Mean spores size of 15 natural populations in series Gravesiana, including length of polar axis and equatorial axis.

More »

Table 3 Expand

Fig 8.

Morphological characters of A. dentatum.

A: the whole plant; B: Pinna shapes; C: scales.

More »

Fig 8 Expand

Fig 9.

Morphological characters of A. obovatum.

More »

Fig 9 Expand

Fig 10.

Morphological characters of A. longzhouensis.

A: the whole plant; B: Pinna shapes and soris; C: scale; D: sporangium.

More »

Fig 10 Expand

Fig 11.

Morphological characters of “JHW1-1” and “RZ4-3” in clade H and clade I.

More »

Fig 11 Expand

Fig 12.

Morphological characters and spores ornamentations of the individuals (from different populations) in the clade H.

More »

Fig 12 Expand