Fig 1.
Hierarchical structure of the proposed approach.
Table 1.
Comparison with the extended TOPSIS of Ye and Li.
Table 2.
Comparison with the extended TOPSIS of Yue.
Table 3.
Decision matrixes of example-subjective attributes.
Table 4.
Normalized decision matrixes.
Table 5.
Weights on attributes of example.
Table 6.
Weights normalized decision matrixes.
Table 7.
Ideal solutions.
Table 8.
Separations, relative closeness, weights and ranking of experts.
Table 9.
Integrated assessment of 17 candidates.