Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

< Back to Article

Fig 1.

Topography and geographical location of Taiwan.

The topography was derived from the ASTER GDEM 2 digital elevation model (cf. Sect. Digital elevation model and related inputs). The depicted vegetation plots are described in Sect. Training data for the MCF conditions map. Country borders were taken from OpenStreetMap [27].

More »

Fig 1 Expand

Fig 2.

Altitudinal occurrence of MCF and non-MCF vegetation plots.

The depicted vegetation plots are described in Sect. Training data for the MCF conditions map.

More »

Fig 2 Expand

Fig 3.

Ground fog frequency map calculated from MODIS data captured between 1 January 2003 and 31 December 2014.

More »

Fig 3 Expand

Fig 4.

Maps of MCF conditions with (A) and without (B) the ground fog frequency being included.

More »

Fig 4 Expand

Table 1.

Validation results for MCF conditions maps A and B.

The best value of each statistical parameter is written in bold type. TP = true positives; TN = true negatives; FP = false positives; FN = false negatives; MCC = Matthews correlation coefficient; PC = Proportion correct (PC); POD = Probability of detection; POFD = Probability of false detection; FAR = False alarm rate (FAR).

More »

Table 1 Expand

Table 2.

Validation results for Random Forest models trained with different raster input sets.

The best value of each statistical parameter is written in bold type. TP = true positives; TN = true negatives; FP = false positives; FN = false negatives; MCC = Matthews correlation coefficient; PC = Proportion correct (PC); POD = Probability of detection; POFD = Probability of false detection; FAR = False alarm rate (FAR).

More »

Table 2 Expand

Fig 5.

Final MCF map (green area), created from the combination of the MCF conditions map B (green and orange area) and the forest map (white and green area).

More »

Fig 5 Expand