Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

< Back to Article

Fig 1.

Selection of studies.

*Correspondence: Short letters to journal editors and similar forms of communication

More »

Fig 1 Expand

Table 1.

Studies reporting the PPV of an MND code in routinely-collected datasets, separated by dataset evaluated.

More »

Table 1 Expand

Table 2.

Studies reporting the sensitivity of an MND code in routinely collected datasets, separated by dataset evaluated.

More »

Table 2 Expand

Table 3.

International Classification of Diseases (ICD) codes for motor neurone disease and its subtypes.

More »

Table 3 Expand

Fig 2.

PPV of an MND code, stratified by type of routinely-collected dataset.

Boxes weighted by study size. PPV: Positive predictive value. Study size: Number of cases with MND codes that were assessed. Routine dataset: The routinely collected source of coded datasets P: primary care data, H: hospital data, D: death certificate data. Heterogeneity measures: I2 = 97%, Chi-squared = 321.6 (df = 12) p<0.0001.

More »

Fig 2 Expand

Fig 3.

Sensitivity of an MND code, stratified by type of routinely-collected dataset.

Boxes weighted by study size. Study size: Number of known MND cases for which a code was sought. Routine dataset: The routinely collected source of coded datasets. P: primary care data, H: hospital data, D: death certificate data. Heterogeneity measures: I2 = 83%, Chi-squared = 23.0 (df = 4) p = 0.0001.

More »

Fig 3 Expand

Table 4.

Within-study sub-group analyses.

More »

Table 4 Expand