Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

< Back to Article

Table 1.

Patient characteristics (n = 41,456).

More »

Table 1 Expand

Fig 1.

Contribution of drugs with an ACB score of 1, 2 or 3 to the cumulative ACB score of the entire study population.

54,211 anticholinergics were used with a cumulative ACB score of 76,934. X-axis groups of patients having individual ACB scores of 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 or ≥ 7. Y-axis Cumulative ACB scores achieved in each group of patients and overview of ACB scoring points originating from drugs with ACB scores of 1,2 or 3, respectively.

More »

Fig 1 Expand

Fig 2.

Most commonly used definite anticholinergic drugs (i.e. ACB score 2 or 3) among the total study population.

Left y-axis Absolute number of drugs with definite anticholinergic properties received by patients. Right y-axis Proportion of the respective drug of all definite anticholinergics according to the ACB scale.

More »

Fig 2 Expand

Table 2.

Multivariable analysis of factors associated with cognitive impairment.

More »

Table 2 Expand

Fig 3.

Cognitive impairment measured by the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) and mean anticholinergic cognitive burden in patients of the GiB-DAT database.

A MMSE score of 0–17 indicates severe, 18–24 moderate and 25–30 no cognitive impairment. Error bar 95% confidence interval, *** p < 0.001 for overall and all pairwise comparisons.

More »

Fig 3 Expand

Fig 4.

Cognitive impairment measured by the item dementia of the 4D+S scale and mean anticholinergic cognitive burden in patients of the GiB-DAT database.

Error bar 95% confidence interval, *** p < 0.0001 for overall and pairwise comparisons except for the difference between moderate and severe dementia was borderline significance (p = 0.043).

More »

Fig 4 Expand