Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

< Back to Article

Fig 1.

Study sites.

Marine protected areas (red) and adjacent areas, where fisheries are allowed (green), at three village sites (Votua, Vatu-o-lalai, Namada) along Fiji’s Coral Coast.

More »

Fig 1 Expand

Fig 2.

Herbivorous fishes.

Box plot for fish density and biomass (120 m-2) of four categories of herbivorous fishes (browsers, grazers, excavating parrotfishes, and scraping parrotfishes) in MPAs and adjacent non-MPAs at three village sites (Votua, Vatu-o-lalai, and Namada) along the Coral Coast of Fiji. * signals the comparisons in which the 95% credible interval indicates a significant effect of protection status.

More »

Fig 2 Expand

Fig 3.

Non-herbivorous fishes.

Density and biomass (120 m-2) of five categories of Non-herbivores. Study sites and symbols as in Fig 2.

More »

Fig 3 Expand

Table 1.

Deviance information criterion (DIC) for models including (Full model) or not (Reduced) protections status as a predictor variable.

Smaller DIC signal preferred models (in bold).

More »

Table 1 Expand

Table 2.

Model results for the observed richness of herbivores and non-herbivores.

Parameter estimates (posterior mean), with 95% credible interval (CI) and effective sample size (ESS), for each level and interactions between levels of fixed factors (and variance associated with random factors). Effect sizes of the interaction site:status are relative to benchmark levels (non-MPAs to MPAs of each site). Text in bold highlight the effects deemed significant according to the 95% CI.

More »

Table 2 Expand

Fig 4.

Grazing by parrotfishes.

Rates of substratum grazing by parrotfishes (% grazed area d-1, mean ± SE) in MPAs and adjacent non-MPAs at three village sites (Votua, Vatu-o-lalai, and Namada) along the Coral Coast of Fiji. * and ** indicate paired bars with significant (p < 0.05) or highly significant (p < 0.001) differences, respectively. Note the different scales of the y-axes.

More »

Fig 4 Expand

Fig 5.

Macroalgal browsing.

Rates of macroalgal removal by herbivores (% of algae consumed in 5 h, mean ± SE). Study sites and symbols as in Fig 2.

More »

Fig 5 Expand

Fig 6.

Benthic cover.

Percentage cover (mean ± SE) of four categories of benthos (scleractinian corals, macroalgae, eplithic algal matrix and others) in MPAs and adjacent non-MPAs, at three village sites (Votua, Vatu-o-lalai, Namada) along Fiji’s Coral Coast. * and ** indicate, respectively, paired bars that differ significantly (p < 0.05) and highly significantly (p < 0.001).

More »

Fig 6 Expand

Fig 7.

Coral recruits.

Density (mean ± SE) of coral recruits m-2 of plot area (see text for details). Study sites and symbols as in Fig 2.

More »

Fig 7 Expand