Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

< Back to Article

Table 1.

Clinical characteristics of the study population.

More »

Table 1 Expand

Fig 1.

Prediction of arrhythmia recurrences using CHADS2, CHA2DS2-VASc, and APPLE scores.

More »

Fig 1 Expand

Table 2.

Association with arrhythmia recurrences after repeat catheter ablation using different scores.

More »

Table 2 Expand

Fig 2.

APPLE score and risk for arrythmia recurrences in repeat catheter ablation in whole study population (n = 379).

The figure presents incidence of arrhythmia recurrences (%) according to each APPLE score point. Compared to patients with an APPLE score of 0 (reference), the risk (OR) for arrhythmia recurrences was 2.9 (95% CI 1.4–6.3, p = 0.006), 3.0 (95% CI 1.3–6.6, p = 0.007) and 6.0 (95% CI 2.2–16.8, p = 0.001) for APPLE scores 1, 2, or ≥3, respectively.

More »

Fig 2 Expand