Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

< Back to Article

Fig 1.

Set of printed opto-mechanical components.

(A) A Michelson interferometer implemented with opto-mechanical components made in plastic. (B) Fused Filament Fabrication (FFF), a method of rapid prototyping: 1. Nozzle ejecting molten material (plastic), 2. Deposited material (modelled part), 3. Controlled movable table. (C) Printing a component using a Prusa-Tairona printer.

More »

Fig 1 Expand

Fig 2.

Mechanism Implementation.

(A) Nuts of different shapes embedded on the plastic immediately after fabrication. (B) Drive screw mechanism implemented using a nut embedded in the plastic and a screw. The precision in the displacement is limited by the nut’s thread. (C) Linear bearings can be replaced by holes carefully made in plastic through which passes a metallic rod.

More »

Fig 2 Expand

Fig 3.

3D printed kinematic mount.

(A) Finished kinematic mount with mirror mounted. (B) 3D model of plastic components (KM top: leftmost component, KM bottom: rightmost component). (C) Components required to build the kinematic mount.

More »

Fig 3 Expand

Table 1.

Bill of Materials for Kinematic Mount.

More »

Table 1 Expand

Fig 4.

3D printed translation stage.

(A) Finished translation stage. (B) 3D model of plastic components (TS top: leftmost component, TS bottom: rightmost component). (C) Components required to build the translation stage.

More »

Fig 4 Expand

Table 2.

Bill of Materials for Translation Stage.

More »

Table 2 Expand

Fig 5.

3D printed integrating sphere.

Panel (A). Integrating sphere using a webcam as a detector. Panel (B). 3D model of the plastic integrating sphere. The inner sphere is printed as a complete piece. In the figure the sphere is divided in two sections for illustrative purposes. Panel (C). Integrating sphere operating when the laboratory lights are turned off.

More »

Fig 5 Expand

Table 3.

Bill of Materials for Integrating Sphere.

More »

Table 3 Expand

Fig 6.

Experimental setup used to characterize 3D printed components.

(A) Setup used to compare two kinematic mounts; KM kinematic mount under test. (B) Setup used to compare two translation stages; TS translation stage under test.

More »

Fig 6 Expand

Fig 7.

Experimental results kinematic mount.

Centroid position as a function of the X knob (A) and Y knob (B).

More »

Fig 7 Expand

Fig 8.

Experimental results translation stage.

Centroid position as a function of the mirror displacement in millimeters.

More »

Fig 8 Expand

Fig 9.

Experimental results integrating sphere.

(A) device response as a function of the intensity (area behind image histogram) for R = 100pixels. (B) Comparison with a commercial power meter after calibration. Maximum error 0.6μW.

More »

Fig 9 Expand