Table 1.
Language and demographic data of the participants in Experiments 1–3.
Fig 1.
Sequence of events on cued trials (Experiment 1–3) and on voluntary trials (Experiment 1).
The cued trial in this case refers to a congruent condition (cartoon waving towards “Red” matches the language cue “Red”).
Fig 2.
Sequence of events on voluntary trials in Experiment 2 and Experiment 3.
Fig 3.
Proportion of congruent choices on stay and switch trials in “Maintain balance” condition (Experiment 1), “No constraint” condition (Experiment 1), Experiment 2 and Experiment 3.
Fig 4.
Proportion of choices as a function of language chosen in the voluntary block (Expt. 1–3)
Fig 5.
Naming latency on stay and switch trials on cued and voluntary blocks (Expt. 1–3).
Table 2.
Results on choices during the two instruction conditions derived from mixed-effect models.
(Experiment 1).
Table 3.
Results on Naming latency in the cued block (Experiment 1).
Table 4.
Results on Naming latency in the voluntary block (Experiment 1).
Table 5.
Results on choice data (Experiment 2).
Table 6.
Results on naming latency in cued and voluntary blocks (Experiment 2).
Table 7.
Results of mixed-effects modelling on language choice (Experiment 3).
Table 8.
Results on Naming latency in cued and voluntary block (Experiment 3).
Fig 6.
Correlation plot for L2 switch rate (when participants switched to the language indicated by the cartoon) vs L2 fluency for Experiment 2 and 3.