Table 1.
Truth Table for the Four Logical Forms (Conjunctive, Biconditional, Conditional, Material Implication) and Examples of Materials.
Fig 1.
Example of the Liking Rating Task in Experiment 1 (Conjunctive Form and FT Target).
Fig 2.
Mean Liking Ratings and Cousineau-Morey Difference Adjusted 95% Confidence Intervals for the Four Logical Forms and Targets in Experiment 1.
Table 2.
Percentages for the Response Categories (True, False, and Void) in the Truth Table Task in Experiment 1.
Table 3.
A Negated Paradigm of a Conditional With an Example of the Conditional Statements and Targets.
Fig 3.
Mean Liking Ratings and Cousineau-Morey Difference Adjusted 95% Confidence Intervals for the Four Targets and Matching in Experiment 2.
Note: ++ double matching, +- antecedent matching, -+ consequent matching,—double mismatching
Table 4.
Percentages for the Response Categories (True, False, and Void) in the Truth Table Task in Experiment 2.
Table 5.
Correlations Between the Number of De Finetti Table Responses in the Truth Table Task, Rational-Experiential Inventory Scores, and Liking Ratings in Experiment 2.
Table 6.
Summary of the Results of the Bayesian Mixed Model Meta-analysis [log(BF)].
Fig 4.
Density and Credible Intervals of 1000 Posterior Samples for the relevant fixed effects of the Maximal Random Effect Structure for the Fixed Effects of the Suppositional * Matching Model.
Vertical lines depict the 25–75% posterior probability intervals.