Fig 1.
Predicted total mosquito density (per km2) for sterile/incompatible male mosquitoes under RCP8.5 at mid elevation.
Model baseline (red line) means no release of modified (sterile or incompatible) mosquitoes, other lines show continuous release of 500 modified male mosquitoes per km2 for 9 months with mate competition coefficient (C = 0.5) between modified and wild male mosquito and different magnitudes of egg mortality (EM, blue line for EM = 0.90, and green line for EM = 0.95).
Fig 2.
Predicted Iiwi density (per km2) for sterile/incompatible male mosquitoes under RCP8.5, A1B, and RCP4.5 climate projections at mid elevation.
Model baseline (red line) means no release of modified (sterile or incompatible) mosquitoes, other lines show continuous release of 500 modified male mosquitoes per km2 for 9 months with mate competition coefficient (C = 0.5) between modified and wild male mosquito and different magnitudes of egg mortality (EM, blue line for EM = 0.90, and green line for EM = 0.95).
Fig 3.
Predicted Iiwi density (per km2) for refractory mosquito strategy under alternative climatic projections at mid elevation.
Model base (red line) means no refractory mosquitoes in the population, others imply a fixed percentage refractory mosquitoes in the population (Ref% = 50%—cyan, 80%—blue, 90%—black, 95%—magnolia and 100%—green, respectively) in alternative climatic projections (RCP8.5, A1B, and RCP4.5) of 21st century.
Fig 4.
Predicted Iiwi density (per km2) for refractory mosquito strategy under alternative climatic projections at high elevation.
Model base (red line) means no refractory mosquitoes in the population, others imply a fixed percentage refractory mosquitoes in the population (Ref% = 50%—cyan,80%—blue, 90%—black, 95%—magnolia and 100%—green, respectively) in alternative climatic projections (RCP8.5, A1B, and RCP4.5) of 21st century.
Table 1.
The population growth rate (PGR) for Iiwi and Amakihi for feral pig control and predator removal in RCP8.5.
Table 2.
The population growth rate (PGR) for Iiwi and Amakihi for feral pig control and release of sterile/incompatible male mosquitoes in RCP8.5.
Table 3.
The population growth rate (PGR) for Iiwi and Amakihi for malaria tolerance and feral pig control in RCP8.5.
Table 4.
The population growth rate (PGR) for Iiwi and Amakihi for malaria tolerance and refractory mosquitoes for RCP8.5.
Table 5.
The population growth rate (PGR) for Iiwi and Amakihi high-elevation forests for malaria tolerance and sterile or incompatible male mosquitoes for RCP8.5.
Table 6.
The population growth rate (PGR) for Iiwi and Amakihi mid-elevation forests for malaria tolerance and sterile or incompatible male mosquitoes for RCP8.5.
Table 7.
The population growth rate (PGR) for Iiwi and Amakihi for malaria tolerance and predator removal for RCP8.5.