Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

< Back to Article

Fig 1.

Locations of precipitation stations.

More »

Fig 1 Expand

Fig 2.

Steps involved in the stationary and non-stationary downscaling approaches.

More »

Fig 2 Expand

Fig 3.

Atmospheric domain for downscaling.

More »

Fig 3 Expand

Table 1.

Three best potential predictors identified for each calendar month for each station.

More »

Table 1 Expand

Fig 4.

Time series of coefficients and constant in MLR based PPRs for Halls Gap for summer, autumn, winter and spring (Period 1 = 1950–69, Period 2 = 1951–70……Period 42 = 1991–2010).

More »

Fig 4 Expand

Table 2.

Statistically significant linear trends in the coefficients and constants in the PPRs.

More »

Table 2 Expand

Table 3.

Most influential statistic of three best potential predictor on coefficients and constant in PPRs for observation station at Halls Gap.

More »

Table 3 Expand

Fig 5.

Scatter between coefficients/constant in PPRs and the most influential statistics of the three best potential predictors for January for Halls Gap station.

More »

Fig 5 Expand

Table 4.

Attributes of Genetic Programming.

More »

Table 4 Expand

Table 5.

Performance comparison of SDM1 and SDM2 runs with NCEP/NCAR reanalysis outputs and 20C3M outputs of HadCM3 for Halls Gap station.

More »

Table 5 Expand

Table 6.

Performance comparison of SDM1 and SDM2 runs with NCEP/NCAR reanalysis outputs and 20C3M outputs of HadCM3 for Birchip station.

More »

Table 6 Expand

Table 7.

Performance comparison of SDM1 and SDM2 runs with NCEP/NCAR reanalysis outputs and 20C3M outputs of HadCM3 for Swan Hill station.

More »

Table 7 Expand