Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

< Back to Article

Fig 1.

Consort 2010 flow diagram.

More »

Fig 1 Expand

Fig 2.

Opaque corneal clouding of grade 4 in patient suffering from MPS I.

More »

Fig 2 Expand

Fig 3.

Cornea verticillata grade 3 in patient suffering from Morbus Fabry.

A bilateral, whorl-like pattern of powdery, white, yellow or brown corneal deposits.

More »

Fig 3 Expand

Table 1.

Grade of corneal clouding in the right (OD) and left (OS) eyes in all study groups.

More »

Table 1 Expand

Table 2.

Mean (estimated from linear mixed effects model) and corresponding 95% confidence interval of BCVA (decimal), spherical equivalent refraction (SEQ) and p-values.

More »

Table 2 Expand

Table 3.

Mean (estimated from linear mixed effects model) and corresponding 95% confidence interval of Goldmann applanation tonometry (GAT), corneal compensated intraocular pressure (IOPcc), Goldmann-correlated intraocular pressure (IOPg), central corneal thickness (CCT), corneal hysteresis (CH), corneal resistance factor (CRF) and corneal density.

More »

Table 3 Expand

Table 4.

Effects of diagnostic group and corneal clouding: p-values.

More »

Table 4 Expand

Fig 4.

Association of GAT, IOPcc, IOPg, CH, CRF, CCT and density with diagnostic group and the grade of the corneal clouding.

Estimated means and 95% confidence intervals are shown.

More »

Fig 4 Expand

Table 5.

The Spearman correlation coefficients evaluated between IOP-measurements: Goldmann applanation tonometry (GAT), corneal compensated intraocular pressure (ccIOP), Goldmann correlated intraocular pressure (IOPg) and corneal biomechanical parameters: central corneal thickness (CCT), corneal hysteresis (CH), corneal resistance factor (CRF), corneal density and the grade of corneal opacity in all study groups.

More »

Table 5 Expand

Fig 5.

Association between Goldmann applanation tonometry (GAT), corneal compensated IOP (IOPcc), Goldmann correlated IOP (IOPg), corneal hysteresis (CH), corneal resistance factor (CRF) central corneal thickness (CCT), corneal density and the grade of corneal clouding in all experimental groups.

Estimated means and 95% confidence intervals are shown.

More »

Fig 5 Expand

Fig 6.

Bland-Altmann Plot for agreement between Goldmann applanation tonometry (GAT) and corneal-compensated IOP (IOPcc).

More »

Fig 6 Expand

Fig 7.

Bland-Altmann Plot for agreement between Goldmann applanation tonometry (GAT) and Goldmann-correlated IOP (IOPg).

More »

Fig 7 Expand

Fig 8.

Bland-Altmann Plot for agreement between Goldmann applanation tonometry (GAT) and palpatory assessed IOP (palp IOP).

More »

Fig 8 Expand

Table 6.

Mean values, standard deviations (SD) and p-values of Goldmann applanation tonometry (GAT), corneal compensated intraocular pressure (ccIOP), Goldmann correlated intraocular pressure (IOPg), palpatory assessed IOP (palp. IOP), central corneal thickness (CCT), corneal hysteresis (CH), corneal resistance factor (CRF) and corneal density for the right (OD) and left eyes (OS) in MPS I-IV.

More »

Table 6 Expand

Fig 9.

Goldmann applanation tonometry (GAT), corneal compensated IOP (IOPcc), Goldmann-correlated IOP (IOPg), corneal resistance factor (CRF), central corneal thickness (CCT) and corneal hysteresis (CH) in MPS type IV, VI and healthy controls in the right (OD) and the left (OS) eyes.

More »

Fig 9 Expand