Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

< Back to Article

Fig 1.

The force-deflection response for a typical bistable mechanism is shown.

An optional preload stabilizes the mechanism for lower force inputs.

More »

Fig 1 Expand

Fig 2.

Labeled bistable mechanism.

More »

Fig 2 Expand

Fig 3.

Pseudo-rigid-body model of the compliant leg.

The compliance is modeled in the torsional and linear springs.

More »

Fig 3 Expand

Fig 4.

Overlay of the PRBM on the bistable mechanism.

More »

Fig 4 Expand

Table 1.

Strength-to-modulus and density ratios for commonly used materials in the space industry.

More »

Table 1 Expand

Fig 5.

Design iterations of the compliant bistable mechanism.

More »

Fig 5 Expand

Fig 6.

Comparing geometry of compliant segments.

The thicker segments increase the force slightly.

More »

Fig 6 Expand

Table 2.

Comparison of stresses for different design iterations of the compliant bistable mechanism.

More »

Table 2 Expand

Fig 7.

Bistable mechanism prototyped in ABS plastic, using a Dimension SST 1200ES 3D Printer, in its second stable position (left) and its fabricated position (right).

More »

Fig 7 Expand

Table 3.

Design parameters for the bistable mechanism prototypes.

More »

Table 3 Expand

Fig 8.

Predicted energy curve of the metallic glass bistable mechanism from the PRBM.

More »

Fig 8 Expand

Fig 9.

Predicted force-displacement curve of the metallic glass bistable mechanism from the PRBM.

More »

Fig 9 Expand

Fig 10.

An example of the finite element mesh for the bistable mechanism.

More »

Fig 10 Expand

Fig 11.

The maximum stress in the identically sized mechanisms as predicted by FEA.

More »

Fig 11 Expand

Fig 12.

(a) Initial position of the finite element model. (b) Position where highest stress occurs during deflection. (c) Second stable position of the model.

More »

Fig 12 Expand

Table 4.

Summary of how changes in the design parameters affect bistability and stress.

More »

Table 4 Expand

Fig 13.

A bistable non-explosive release mechanism demonstrator in its second stable position (left) and its fabricated position (right).

More »

Fig 13 Expand

Fig 14.

Prototype of a pin-puller non-explosive release mechanism in its second stable position (left) and its fabricated position (right).

More »

Fig 14 Expand

Fig 15.

Prototype of a cutter non-explosive release mechanism in its second stable position (left) and its fabricated position (right).

More »

Fig 15 Expand

Fig 16.

Conceptual illustration of the cable cutting mechanism being employed as an antennae release mechanism on a cube-sat.

More »

Fig 16 Expand