Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

< Back to Article

Table 1.

Information about the geographical units involved and family physicians by urban areas.

More »

Table 1 Expand

Fig 1.

A comparison of population to physician ratios: simple ratio estimated at city level; City mean of simple ratio estimated at neighbourhood level; 3SFCA mean accessibility scores estimated at neighbourhood level.

More »

Fig 1 Expand

Fig 2.

A comparison of physician-to-population ratio between simple ratio calculated using ([Physicians in an area/population of the area] * 1000) (in left column), and b) three- step floating catchment areas (3SFCA) method at the neighbourhood level (in right column) in three Canadian cities (a. Toronto, b. Montreal, and c. Vancouver).

More »

Fig 2 Expand

Table 2.

Summary of physician-to-populations ratios by urban areas.

More »

Table 2 Expand

Fig 3.

Spatial accessibility to PHC services by urban areas at the neighbourhood level estimated using the three steps floating catchment areas method (2011 DA Population, 3km road network buffer distance).

More »

Fig 3 Expand

Table 3.

Proportion (%) of population in urban areas by group of accessibility score and LISA clusters.

More »

Table 3 Expand

Fig 4.

LISA cluster map of spatial accessibility to PHC services (physicians to population ratio) by urban areas.

Global Moran’s I of urban areas as given are found statistically significant (pseudo-significant = 0.05).

More »

Fig 4 Expand

Table 4.

Percentages of census-based socio-demographic variables within broad categories of accessibility scores by urban areas (where R represents the % out of total population and P represents % out of total population of respective socio-demographic factor).

More »

Table 4 Expand