Fig 1.
Hybrid Delay Tolerant Network.
Fig 2.
Monotonically Increasing Network Instability Curve.
Fig 3.
UA Configurations for Testbed.
Table 1.
Testbed Configurations.
Fig 4.
UA-1 in action.
Fig 5.
IMU readings for UA-1 vs. Operational Time.
Fig 6.
Randomness vs. Operational Time.
Fig 7.
Active nodes vs. Operational Time.
Fig 8.
Node Failures vs. Operational Time.
Fig 9.
Data Rate vs. Operational Time.
Fig 10.
PDR vs. Operational Time.
Fig 11.
Overheads vs. Operational Time.
Fig 12.
Delays vs. Operational Time.
Table 2.
Simulation Configurations.
Fig 13.
PDR vs. Time.
Fig 14.
PDR vs. Buffer.
Fig 15.
PDR vs. Randomness.
Fig 16.
PDR vs. UA.
Fig 17.
Overheads vs. Time.
Fig 18.
Overheads vs. Buffer.
Fig 19.
Overheads vs. Randomness.
Fig 20.
Overheads vs. UA.
Fig 21.
Convergence Rate vs. Time.
Fig 22.
Convergence Rate vs. Buffer.
Fig 23.
Convergence Rate vs. Randomness.
Fig 24.
Convergence Rate vs. UA.
Fig 25.
Cost of Convergence vs. Time.
Fig 26.
Cost of Convergence vs. Buffer.
Fig 27.
Cost of Convergence vs. Randomness.
Fig 28.
Cost of Convergence vs. UA.
Fig 29.
Delays vs. Time.
Fig 30.
Delays vs. Buffer.
Fig 31.
Delays vs. Randomness.
Fig 32.
Delays vs. UA.
Table 3.
95% Confidence Interval of the Difference for the Variation in Buffer Size.
Table 4.
95% Confidence Interval of the Difference over Simulation Time.
Table 5.
95% Confidence Interval of the Difference for the variation in Randomness.
Table 6.
95% Confidence Interval of the Difference for the variation in number of UA.
Fig 33.
Confidence Plot for PDR (%) with Overheads.
Fig 34.
Confidence Plot for PDR (%) with Average Delays.
Fig 35.
Confidence Plot for Overheads with Average Delays.
Table 7.
Comparison of the State-of-art Models For Delay Tolerant Network Formations: High (↑), Medium (↔), Low (↓).