Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

< Back to Article

Table 1.

Characteristics of the biofeedback devices.

More »

Table 1 Expand

Table 2.

Characteristics of the study population arranged in pairs of a physical therapist and a patient.

More »

Table 2 Expand

Table 3.

Perceived overall usability for both biofeedback devices.

More »

Table 3 Expand

Table 4.

User performances for both the biofeedback devices.

More »

Table 4 Expand

Fig 1.

Overall satisfaction with SmartStep and OpenGo Science from the patient’s and physical therapist’s perspective.

Patient SM = patient perspective on SmartStep, Patient OG = patient perspective on OpenGo Science, PT SM = physical therapist perspective on SmartStep, PT OG = physical therapist perspective on OpenGo Science.

More »

Fig 1 Expand

Table 5.

Patient and physical therapist satisfaction with the biofeedback devices measured on a five-point Likert scale.

More »

Table 5 Expand

Table 6.

Patient and physical therapist acceptability of the biofeedback devices measured on a five-point Likert scale.

More »

Table 6 Expand