Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

< Back to Article

Fig 1.

Stall test with 30° flap for model validation with stall occurring around t = 20 s.

More »

Fig 1 Expand

Fig 2.

Control system configuration for μ-synthesis design.

More »

Fig 2 Expand

Fig 3.

During flight simulation, the aircraft is split into a number of surfaces and the forces on each are computed by BET.

Reprinted from http://www.x-plane.com/desktop/how-x-plane-works/ under a CC BY 4.0, with permission from Laminar Research, original copyright 2011.

More »

Fig 3 Expand

Fig 4.

Illustration of the main idea of blade element theory (BET) on a propeller blade.

More »

Fig 4 Expand

Table 1.

Mass, geometry parameters and performance specifications for Cessna 172.

More »

Table 1 Expand

Table 2.

Stability derivatives for Cessna 172.

More »

Table 2 Expand

Fig 5.

The setup for verification of the results through nonlinear dynamical simulations and/or SIL tests based on BET.

More »

Fig 5 Expand

Fig 6.

Closed-loop step response for individual SISO systems.

More »

Fig 6 Expand

Fig 7.

States of perturbed aircrafts under combined SISO control.

More »

Fig 7 Expand

Fig 8.

Singular value plot for the loop-shaping controller.

More »

Fig 8 Expand

Fig 9.

States of the nominal aircraft under loop-shaping control.

More »

Fig 9 Expand

Fig 10.

Inputs to the nominal aircraft under loop-shaping control.

More »

Fig 10 Expand

Fig 11.

States of perturbed aircrafts under loop-shaping control.

More »

Fig 11 Expand

Fig 12.

Inputs of perturbed aircrafts under loop-shaping control.

More »

Fig 12 Expand

Fig 13.

Third order multiplicative uncertainty model.

More »

Fig 13 Expand

Fig 14.

Block diagram for μ-synthesis control design via D-K iteration.

More »

Fig 14 Expand

Fig 15.

States of the nominal aircraft under μ-synthesis control.

More »

Fig 15 Expand

Fig 16.

Inputs to the nominal aircraft under μ-synthesis control.

More »

Fig 16 Expand

Fig 17.

States of perturbed aircrafts under μ-synthesis control.

More »

Fig 17 Expand

Fig 18.

Inputs of perturbed aircrafts under μ-synthesis control.

More »

Fig 18 Expand

Fig 19.

States of the nominal aircraft with loop-shaped inner and outer controllers.

More »

Fig 19 Expand

Fig 20.

Inputs to the nominal aircraft with loop-shaped inner and outer controllers.

More »

Fig 20 Expand

Fig 21.

Outputs of perturbed aircrafts with loop-shaped inner and outer controllers.

More »

Fig 21 Expand

Fig 22.

Inputs to perturbed aircrafts with loop-shaped inner and outer controllers.

More »

Fig 22 Expand

Fig 23.

States of a 30% perturbed aircraft with inner/outer loop-shaping control during final test scenario.

More »

Fig 23 Expand

Fig 24.

Inputs to a 30% perturbed aircraft with inner/outer loop-shaping control during final test scenario.

More »

Fig 24 Expand

Fig 25.

Trajectory of a 30% perturbed aircraft with inner/outer loop-shaping control during final test scenario.

More »

Fig 25 Expand