Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

< Back to Article

Table 1.

Socio-demographic characteristics of the sample.

More »

Table 1 Expand

Table 2.

Logistic regression models showing associations between social protection receipt and SDG indicators among boys (N = 1475).

More »

Table 2 Expand

Fig 1.

Predicted percent probabilities of SDG indicators when ‘cash,’ ‘care,’ ‘cash and care,’ or ‘no provision’ (‘none’) are received, holding all other covariates in the logistic regression model at their average levels (see Tables 2 and 3 for variables included in final predictive model for each outcome).

Error bars indicate 95% confidence intervals.

More »

Fig 1 Expand

Fig 2.

Panel A shows the predicted percent probabilities of adolescent hunger among boys for the interaction between missing necessities and receipt of ‘care’ provisions. Panel B shows the predicted percent probabilities of school non-enrolment among girls for the interaction between missing necessities and receipt of care provisions.

More »

Fig 2 Expand

Table 3.

Logistic regression models showing associations between social protection receipt and SDG indicators among girls (N = 1926).

More »

Table 3 Expand