Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

< Back to Article

Fig 1.

Participant Flow.

Flowchart illustrating application of inclusion and exclusion criteria for the current study.

More »

Fig 1 Expand

Fig 2.

Clinical Diagnosis by Visit.

Heatmap depicting the clinical diagnosis assigned to each participant at each study visit. The left panel represents participants whose most recent diagnosis was Control. The middle panel represents participants whose most recent diagnosis was MCI. The right panel represents participants whose most recent diagnosis was AD. Colors reflect the diagnosis made at a given visit, which does not always correspond to the most recent diagnosis. Participants' most recent visit may have occurred beyond the 5 visits used in the current study.

More »

Fig 2 Expand

Fig 3.

Immediate Recall Practice Effects.

Standardized test scores on the immediate recall condition as a function of visit number, test, and clinical diagnosis. Error bars represent 95% confidence intervals and account for within-subjects variability.

More »

Fig 3 Expand

Table 1.

Baseline Demographic Characteristics of the Current Sample.

More »

Table 1 Expand

Table 2.

Results of the Linear Mixed Effects Model for Immediate Recall.

More »

Table 2 Expand

Fig 4.

Delayed Recall Practice Effects.

Standardized test scores on the delayed recall condition as a function of visit number, test, and clinical diagnosis. Error bars represent 95% confidence intervals and account for within-subjects variability.

More »

Fig 4 Expand

Table 3.

Results of the Linear Mixed Effects Model for Delayed Recall.

More »

Table 3 Expand