Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

< Back to Article

Fig 1.

Example of 3D-T1-BB-VISTA acquisition and quantification of aortic wall characteristics.

Left images: example of sagittal and reconstructed transversal images of the descending thoracic aorta obtained with the 3D-T1-BB-VISTA sequence in a 32-year-old female participant. Right images: graphic illustration of quantification of descending thoracic aortic wall characteristics. A and B are a graphic and in vivo representation of contour tracing and thickness measurements, respectively. C is a schematic illustration of the quantification methods for the various studied aortic wall characteristics.

More »

Fig 1 Expand

Fig 2.

Example of short axis cine image and quantification of cardiac function parameters.

Left images: example of 4 chamber and short axis multi-slice sensitivity-encoding steady-state free precession cine images at the level of the ventricular base (left bottom) of a 32-year-old female participant. Right images: graphic illustration of the semi-automatic quantification of cardiac function parameters.

More »

Fig 2 Expand

Fig 3.

Example of double oblique candy cane and through-plane images and quantification of PWV parameters.

Upper left images: example of plain and traced candy cane images in 32-year-old female participant. The aortic centreline was traced to measure aortic distances. Middle/lower left images: example of plain and traced through-plane images. Contours were traced in the ascending (pulmonary trunk) and proximal descending aorta and near the dome of the liver for aortic velocity mapping. Right image: illustration of velocity graph. Proximal, descending and total thoracic aortic PWV were quantified via linear modelling.

More »

Fig 3 Expand

Table 1.

Characteristics of study population (N = 131).

More »

Table 1 Expand

Table 2.

Age and sex specific percentiles of descending thoracic aortic wall characteristics in the study sample (n = 124).

More »

Table 2 Expand

Table 3.

Age and sex specific percentiles of indexed LV function parameters in the study sample (n = 129).

More »

Table 3 Expand

Table 4.

Age and sex specific percentiles of indexed RV function parameters in the study sample (n = 129).

More »

Table 4 Expand

Table 5.

Age and sex specific percentiles of thoracic aortic PWV in the study sample (n = 118).

More »

Table 5 Expand