Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

< Back to Article

Fig 1.

Representative scatter plots of normalized miRNA expression showing the correlation between FFPE and frozen paired tumor samples.

More »

Fig 1 Expand

Fig 2.

Correlation matrix heatmap showing the Euclidean distance between non-tumor bearing liver and ICC samples.

Darker color indicates stronger correlation.

More »

Fig 2 Expand

Fig 3.

Heat map of the differentially expressed miRNAs (adjusted p value <0.001) between ICC and non-tumor bearing liver FFPE samples.

More »

Fig 3 Expand

Fig 4.

Selected miRNAs based on the highest degree of up regulation (fold change, blue columns) and absolute expression counts (red columns).

Fold change was calculated between ICC and non tumor-bearing liver. Error bars represent standard error of the mean.

More »

Fig 4 Expand

Fig 5.

RT-qPCR validation of differentially expressed miRNAs in tissue (A) and plasma (B).

(A) differential expression of miR-21, miR-34c, miR-200b and miR-221 on tissues from 10 independent patients with ICC and 10 normal liver samples. Horizontal bars represent mean value. (B) Expression levels of circulating miR-21 and miR-221 in an independent cohort of patients with ICC vs healthy controls.

More »

Fig 5 Expand

Fig 6.

Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve for circulating miR-21 for the diagnosis intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma.

ROC was performed for plasma miR-21 from patients with ICC vs healthy controls. Area under the curve (AUC) for miR-21 is 0.94.

More »

Fig 6 Expand

Table 1.

Normalized expression of selected miRNAs in plasma.

More »

Table 1 Expand

Table 2.

Clinicopathological features of ICC patients.

More »

Table 2 Expand