Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

< Back to Article

Fig 1.

Data distribution of parameter.

More »

Fig 1 Expand

Table 1.

Polysaccharides data set with descriptors and EC50 values of the DPPH scavenging activity.

More »

Table 1 Expand

Fig 2.

Correlation between the matrix of parameters and EC50 value of the DPPH scavenging activity.

More »

Fig 2 Expand

Fig 3.

Proportion of the parameters effecting on EC50 value of the DPPH scavenging activity.

More »

Fig 3 Expand

Fig 4.

A comparison of experimental vs predicted EC50 using MLR method.

More »

Fig 4 Expand

Table 2.

Experimental and predicted values of EC50 for the DPPH-scavenging activity of polysaccharides using MLR, ANN and SVM models.

More »

Table 2 Expand

Fig 5.

A comparison of experimental vs predicted EC50 using ANN method.

More »

Fig 5 Expand

Fig 6.

A comparison of experimental vs predicted EC50 using SVM method.

More »

Fig 6 Expand

Table 3.

Comparison of MLR, ANN and SVM models for the DPPH scavenging activity of polysaccharides.

More »

Table 3 Expand

Table 4.

MW and EC50 values of the DPPH scavenging activity.

More »

Table 4 Expand

Fig 7.

Correlation scatter plots of EC50 and MW.

More »

Fig 7 Expand

Table 5.

Polysaccharides data set with descriptors and their EC50 values of the hydroxyl radicals scavenging activity.

More »

Table 5 Expand

Table 6.

Correlation matrix showing inter-correlation among various parameters and EC50 of the hydroxyl radicals scavenging activity.

More »

Table 6 Expand

Table 7.

Comparison of MLR, ANN and SVM models for the hydroxyl radicals scavenging activity of polysaccharides.

More »

Table 7 Expand

Table 8.

Sensitivity analysis from ANN models.

More »

Table 8 Expand