Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

< Back to Article

Table 1.

Study population characteristics and comparison between survivor and fatality groups.

Continuous variables are presented as mean±SD or median (25th–75th percentile). The proportions in this table reflect the number of patients with each finding divided by the total number of patients for whom data were available.

More »

Table 1 Expand

Fig 1.

Flow chart for the selection of the participating patients, according to the STROBE guidelines.

HSJ—Hospital São João, Porto, Portugal; CDC—Chest Disease Centre (ambulatory care), Vila Nova de Gaia, Portugal.

More »

Fig 1 Expand

Table 2.

Multivariable logistic regression analysis for deriving tuberculosis risk score for death.

More »

Table 2 Expand

Fig 2.

A—ROC curve for the logistic regression model (clinical prediction rule equation, S1 Fig) and clinical scoring system (0 to 8 points) | B—Kaplan-Meier estimates of survival in low-risk (clinical score 0–2), moderate-risk (clinical score 3–5) and high-risk (clinical score 6–8) tuberculosis patients. The mortality in each group at different time-points is shown below | C—TB risk assessment tool (TReAT), using baseline clinical features for stratifying patients with pulmonary tuberculosis into severity groups according to the probability of death at 6 months.

More »

Fig 2 Expand

Table 3.

Test characteristics with different prediction scores for mortality in the derivation cohort of patients with pulmonary tuberculosis.

More »

Table 3 Expand

Table 4.

Comparison of risk groups mortality in the derivation and validation cohortsa.

More »

Table 4 Expand