Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

< Back to Article

Fig 1.

Schematic representation of salt water intrusion under sharp-interface and Ghyben-Herzberg assumptions.

More »

Fig 1 Expand

Fig 2.

Cross section of a coastal freshwater aquifer.

Modelling parameters.

More »

Fig 2 Expand

Fig 3.

Homogeneous rectangular aquifer.

More »

Fig 3 Expand

Fig 4.

Cone of depression and safety distance areas around every aquifer well.

More »

Fig 4 Expand

Fig 5.

Pipelined Data Flow through MODULE I.

More »

Fig 5 Expand

Fig 6.

Flow chart of MODULE I.

More »

Fig 6 Expand

Fig 7.

Chart and Data Flow through MODULE II.

More »

Fig 7 Expand

Table 1.

Aquifer and well characteristics.

More »

Table 1 Expand

Table 2.

Pumping management parameters.

More »

Table 2 Expand

Table 3.

Well Coordinates for the first group of simulation cases.

More »

Table 3 Expand

Table 4.

Well Coordinates for the second group of simulation cases.

More »

Table 4 Expand

Fig 8.

Optimal positions of the toe interface contour line for all simulation case.

More »

Fig 8 Expand

Fig 9.

Evolution of the objective/profit function P(Q(k)) for all simulation cases.

More »

Fig 9 Expand

Fig 10.

Evolution of the well pumping rates for all simulation cases.

More »

Fig 10 Expand

Table 5.

ALOPEX pumping management performance: Optimal Parameter Values.

More »

Table 5 Expand

Table 6.

Implementing the Stopping Criterion: ALOPEX Optimal Parameter Values.

More »

Table 6 Expand

Table 7.

Coordinates xτ (meters) of the toe critical points for all simulation cases.

More »

Table 7 Expand

Table 8.

Coordinates xs (meters) of the stagnation points for all simulation cases.

More »

Table 8 Expand

Fig 11.

Behavior of S(Q) and Δx under Profile 1.

Dependence of S(Q) and Δx on N and K for Test Cases IIIa and IIIb using Profile 1.

More »

Fig 11 Expand

Fig 12.

Behavior of S(Q) and Δx under Profile 2.

Dependence of S(Q) and Δx on N and K for Test Cases IIIa and IIIb using Profile 2.

More »

Fig 12 Expand