Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

< Back to Article

Fig 1.

RNAMethPre Workflow.

Positive and negative datasets were obtained (Step 1). Features of the datasets were extracted to obtain 366-dimensional vectors for each site as training data. The SVM classifier was trained to generate the SVM model and the performance of the model was evaluated (Step 2). Human transcriptome-wide m6A sites were predicted and a web server was constructed (Step 3).

More »

Fig 1 Expand

Fig 2.

Overall Performances of Mammalian Classifiers Based on 5-fold Cross-validation Tests.

(A) The ROC curve illustrating the performance for full transcript mode. (B) The ROC curve illustrating the performance for mature mRNA mode.

More »

Fig 2 Expand

Fig 3.

Performances of the Mammalian Classifiers on Independent Testing Datasets.

(A) ROC curve illustrating the performance on the unbalanced independent testing dataset in full transcript mode. (B) Precision-recall curve illustrating the performance on the unbalanced independent testing dataset of full transcript mode. (C) ROC curve illustrating the performance on the unbalanced independent testing dataset of mature mRNA mode. (D) Precision-recall curve illustrating the performance on the unbalanced independent testing dataset of mature mRNA mode.

More »

Fig 3 Expand

Table 1.

Performance of RNAMethPre for various stringency thresholds and comparison with SRAMP.

More »

Table 1 Expand

Table 2.

Comparison of RNAMethPre with the Existing Web Server SRAMP using Independent Unbalanced Datasets.

More »

Table 2 Expand

Fig 4.

The user interface of the RNAMethPre web server.

More »

Fig 4 Expand

Fig 5.

The genome browser to visualize the query results.

More »

Fig 5 Expand