Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

< Back to Article

Fig 1.

Conserved lands in Vermont.

Spatial distribution of conserved lands by (A) ownership type and (B) photo user days (PUD; see description of this indicator in “Data Sources”) between 2007 and 2014.

More »

Fig 1 Expand

Table 1.

Landscape attributes of conserved lands in Vermont.

More »

Table 1 Expand

Fig 2.

Relationships between photo user days (PUD) and survey user days (SUD) within Vermont state parks between 2007 and 2014.

Graphs show log-transformed data with corresponding linear regression line and 95% confidence intervals. Panels show: (A) PUD vs. SUD; (B) PUD by in-state users vs. SUD by in-state visitors; (C) PUD by out-of-state users vs. SUD out-of-state visitors.

More »

Fig 2 Expand

Table 2.

Linear regression models quantifying relationships between survey user days (SUD; log transformed) and photo user days (PUD; log transformed) within Vermont state parks.

More »

Table 2 Expand

Table 3.

Multiple linear regression models quantifying relationships between visits to conserved land, as indicated by photo user days (PUD; log transformed), and landscape attributes.

More »

Table 3 Expand

Table 4.

Multiple linear regression models quantifying relationships between change in visits to conserved land (as indicated by a change in photo user days [PUD] between two time periods [2007–2010 and 2011–2014] and landscape attributes (including static and dynamic attributes).

More »

Table 4 Expand