Fig 1.
Flow diagram of study patients.
Table 1.
Baseline characteristics of the study population.
Table 2.
Pacemaker settings and data acquired immediately post-procedure and at follow-up interrogation.
Table 3.
Predictors of persistent or permanent atrial fibrillation.
Fig 2.
Numbers of patients in models one and two based on integrated scores.
Table 4.
Predictive function of integrated scoring models compared to the HATCH scoring model after seven years of follow-up.
Fig 3.
PeAF incidence in low or high-scoring groups defined by integrated scoring models one and two.
PeAF incidence in the high-scoring group was significantly greater than in the low-scoring group for both models one (20.6% ± 3.4% vs. 2.9% ± 0.9%, p < 0.001) and two (22.8% ± 3.8% vs. 5.3% ± 1.7%, p < 0.001).