Fig 1.
According to our working framework, intergroup threat biases estimation of distance (making threatening out-group members seem closer), which can increase discrimination. All of these factors are subject to the degree to which people identify with their in-group.
Fig 2.
Distance estimates as a function of perceived threat and US-Mexico border strength manipulation.
Fig 3.
Size estimates as a function of perceived threat and US-Mexico border strength manipulation.
Fig 4.
Perceived physical distance to the out-group estimated by participants who reported the quality of their cross-group friendships with out-group members, as a function of whether or not they were presented with an apology from the out-group.
Fig 5.
Support for discriminatory policies as a function of collective identification and distance manipulation.
Fig 6.
Distance between participants’ own chosen seat and their chosen seat for a Red Sox fan’s seat.