Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

< Back to Article

Table 1.

Clinical description of the analyzed group.

More »

Table 1 Expand

Fig 1.

Samples of a single MRI slice with contouring of the four segmented muscles (axial view).

Legend: Glut min–gluteus minimus muscle, Glut med–gluteus medius muscle, Glut max–gluteus maximus muscle, Pir–piriformis muscle. Muscles were contoured in ITK-SNAP where the structures were outlined slice-by-slice by pointing and clicking with a mouse. The program connected the consecutive points with lines.

More »

Fig 1 Expand

Fig 2.

Sample of a single MRI slice with final segmentation of the four chosen muscles.

Legend: Glut min–gluteus minimus muscle, Glut med–gluteus medius muscle, Glut max–gluteus maximus muscle, Pir–piriformis muscle. All anatomical objects defined by closed contours were filled in by selected colors.

More »

Fig 2 Expand

Table 2.

Differences in the frequency of LBLP patients with a smaller volume of the left muscles compared to the right muscles.

More »

Table 2 Expand

Table 3.

Comparison of the mean values for the four pelvic muscles volume (symptomatic v. non-symptomatic side of the LBLP group).

More »

Table 3 Expand

Table 4.

Differences in the frequency of healthy volunteers with a smaller volume of the left muscles compared to the right muscles.

More »

Table 4 Expand

Fig 3.

Overall scatter of volume measurements in [cm3] performed by two independent raters (1 and 2) in LBLP patients.

More »

Fig 3 Expand

Fig 4.

Overall scatter of volume measurements in [cm3] performed by two independent raters (1 and 2) in healthy volunteers.

More »

Fig 4 Expand

Table 5.

Concordance and intra-class correlations between volume measurements made by two independent raters (1 and 2) in LBLP patients and healthy volunteers.

More »

Table 5 Expand