Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

< Back to Article

Fig 1.

Designed phantom used in this study.

More »

Fig 1 Expand

Table 1.

Results of mean and standard deviation (M±SD) CT numbers, paired t-test results, and absolute percentage differences between the CT numbers of each substitute material obtained from the scanner and CorePLAN treatment planning system at each energy (kVp).

More »

Table 1 Expand

Table 2.

Results of mean and standard deviation (M±SD) CT numbers, paired t-test results, and absolute percentage differences between the CT numbers of each substitute material obtained from the scanner and MIRS treatment planning system at each energy (kVp).

More »

Table 2 Expand

Fig 2.

Variations in mean CT numbers among different energies of scanner (kVp) at the scanner and two treatment planning systems (CorePLAN and MIRS) for various tissue-equivalent materials.

More »

Fig 2 Expand

Fig 3.

Mean CT number values of CT scanner, CorePLAN, and MIRS treatment planning systems at the same energy (kVp) for various tissue-equivalent materials.

More »

Fig 3 Expand

Fig 4.

CT number variations according to change of kVp for different materials.

More »

Fig 4 Expand

Table 3.

P-values resulted from the CT number variations of each substitute material with changing energy.

More »

Table 3 Expand

Table 4.

Calculated doses of CorePLAN on the center of the scanned phantom at three kVp's of scanner using 6 and 15 MV photon beams.

More »

Table 4 Expand

Table 5.

Calculated doses of MIRS on the center of the scanned phantom at three kVp's of scanner using 6 and 15 MV photon beams.

More »

Table 5 Expand