Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

< Back to Article

Fig 1.

Concentration versus time curve for E2 and GV models for four VE values at CL of 100 ml/min (left panel) and 40 ml/min (right panel).

More »

Fig 1 Expand

Fig 2.

For E2 models for four VE values at CL of 100 ml/min (left panel) and 40 ml/min (right panel), the percentage of terminal apparent volume, percent dose mass in time and half-life of the drug as a function of time.

Dashed horizontal line indicates 95% of final volume.

More »

Fig 2 Expand

Fig 3.

For GV models for 4 VE values at CL of 100 ml/min (left panel) and 40 ml/min (right panel), the percentage of terminal apparent volume, percent dose mass in time and half-life of the drug as a function of time.

Dashed horizontal line indicates 95% of final volume.

More »

Fig 3 Expand

Table 1.

Time to achieve apparent volume of distribution to 95% of Varea after the intravenous bolus of the drug and terminal half-life of the drug from E2 and GV models.

More »

Table 1 Expand

Table 2.

Pharmacokinetic parameters from the weighted biexponential (E2) and the Tk-GV models.

Comparable measures boxed.

More »

Table 2 Expand

Table 3.

Wilcoxon tests with median parameter comparisons.

More »

Table 3 Expand

Fig 4.

Schematic diagram showing E2 compartmental and GV variable volume models of drug distribution.

The E2 model could also be drawn as a variable volume model in which case a scale factor αexp = VE/Vd(∞) < 1 would define the physical volume at time t to be αexpVd(t). Similarly, for the variable volume adaptively obtained GV model, one can define α = VE/Vd(∞) < 1, and an expanding physical volume αVd(t). Note, both αexp and α are constants at all times for their respective models. The term VSS can be confusing because 1) VSS implies that VE is always a steady state volume, which is not the case as the GV model αVd(t) < VE is concentration depleted at late time, see Eq (30). 2) VSS implies that VE only exists at t = ∞, whereas VE is defined all of the time, i.e., on t = [0,∞) by Eqs (8 & 7). Finally, 3) VSS implies an expected physical volume of distribution for sums of exponential term bolus models, and the apparent volume of distribution for a constant infusion experiment, whereas VE applies to more models as the expected volume of physical distribution of a drug for both the bolus and constant infusion experiments.

More »

Fig 4 Expand