Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

< Back to Article

Table 1.

Intervention content and means of implementation.

More »

Table 1 Expand

Fig 1.

Participant flowchart.

Numbers in percentage are of eligible students except for percentage lost to follow-up, which is of consenting students with a baseline measure of the primary outcome or mathematics skills. Consenting students differ from numbers published previously [18] as student’s not following age appropriate curriculum (n = 14) were not included in the trial. The flow of schools is presented in [18].

More »

Fig 1 Expand

Table 2.

Baseline characteristics of participants by group allocation and gender.

Values are numbers (percentages) unless stated otherwise.

More »

Table 2 Expand

Table 3.

Intervention effects on the flanker task and academic performance.

More »

Table 3 Expand

Table 4.

Intervention effects on cardiorespiratory fitness and anthropometric variables.

More »

Table 4 Expand

Table 5.

Intervention effects on physical activity according to group allocation.

More »

Table 5 Expand

Fig 2.

Self-reported class-room and scheduled recess physical activity in the intervention group.

Minutes of physical activity/week reported on the “activity watch” by teachers in intervention classes during the intervention period. For each week the median, the lowest and the highest class values are depicted. Interventions week 5 and 13 are holidays but lines are drawn through for graphical appearances.

More »

Fig 2 Expand