Table 1.
Patient characteristics for total group (n = 50) and videotaped participants (n = 27).
Table 2.
Construct validity of five dyspnoea scores by testing difference between subgroups in five predefined hypotheses.
Table 3.
Concurrent validity of five dyspnoea scores by correlating total scores with oxygen saturation, Fleming’s respiratory rate percentile and the dyspnoea severity score.
Table 4.
Agreement and responsiveness of the five dyspnoea scores using different anchors of change.
Table 5.
Inter and intrarater reliability and internal consistency of the five dyspnoea scores.
Table 6.
Floor and ceiling scores and percentages in five dyspnoea scores.
Table 7.
Summary of assessed quality criteria for the five dyspnoea scores bases on this study and earlier review by Bekhof et al.[9].