Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

< Back to Article

Table 1.

Baseline characteristics of study population.

More »

Table 1 Expand

Fig 1.

The distribution of LS and CAP values according to histologic fibrosis and steatosis grade.

The bar lines mean the range of each grade of steatosis and fibrosis. LS, liver stiffness; CAP, controlled attenuation parameter.

More »

Fig 1 Expand

Table 2.

Diagnostic performance of CAP for assessing hepatic steatosis in patients with NAFLD.

More »

Table 2 Expand

Table 3.

Diagnostic performance of LS for assessing liver fibrosis in patients with NAFLD

More »

Table 3 Expand

Table 4.

Independent predictors of NASH and corresponding rounded risk score for CLA score.

More »

Table 4 Expand

Table 5.

CLA score and corresponding NASH prevalence.

More »

Table 5 Expand

Fig 2.

Internal validation of CLA scores for predicting NASH.

AUROC, area under receiver operating characteristic curve; CI, confidence interval.

More »

Fig 2 Expand