Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

< Back to Article

Fig 1.

Specimens’ details, (a) Side view of C-shaped angle connectors (MV specimens), (b) Side view of L-shaped angle connectors (MH specimens), (c) Top view.

More »

Fig 1 Expand

Table 1.

Properties of specimens.

More »

Table 1 Expand

Fig 2.

Model of push-out test specimen (a) A quarter of push-out test specimen & (b) Full view of push-out test specimen.

More »

Fig 2 Expand

Fig 3.

Finite element type and mesh.

More »

Fig 3 Expand

Fig 4.

Contact interaction and constraint conditions surfaces.

A, Surfaces in contact interaction between angle and concrete. B, Surfaces in contact interaction between steel flange and concrete. C, Surfaces in tie constraint between steel flange and angle. D, Surfaces in contact interaction between rigid base and concrete. E, Rebar embedded in concrete slab.

More »

Fig 4 Expand

Fig 5.

Boundary conditions and loading surface.

A, Y-axis symmetric boundary condition. B, X-axis symmetric boundary condition. C, Rigid base boundary condition and loading surface on top.

More »

Fig 5 Expand

Fig 6.

Uniaxial stress-strain curve of concrete EC2 [17].

More »

Fig 6 Expand

Fig 7.

Un-axial stress-strain curve for 30 MPa concrete.

More »

Fig 7 Expand

Fig 8.

Stress-strain curve of tensile behaviour of concrete [15].

More »

Fig 8 Expand

Fig 9.

Linear (ABAQUS manual)(a), Bilinear [19] (b) and exponential [20] tension softening model [15] (c).

More »

Fig 9 Expand

Fig 10.

Tensile stress versus cracking displacement curve.

More »

Fig 10 Expand

Fig 11.

Tensile damage parameter versus cracking displacement.

More »

Fig 11 Expand

Fig 12.

Uniaxial stress-strain curve for steel.

More »

Fig 12 Expand

Table 2.

Steel properties.

More »

Table 2 Expand

Fig 13.

Comparison of experimental results and finite element simulation for C-shaped angle connectors.

Concrete f’c = 29.45,22.43,31.07,25.42MPa (from top left clockwise).

More »

Fig 13 Expand

Fig 14.

Comparison of the shear strength capacities of C-shaped angle connectors obtained from FE analyses and experiments.

More »

Fig 14 Expand

Fig 15.

Comparison of experimental results and finite element simulation for L-shaped angle connectors.

Concrete f’c = 29.25,29.5,27.92,24.97MPa (from top left clockwise).

More »

Fig 15 Expand

Fig 16.

Comparison of the shear strength capacities of L-shaped angle connectors obtained from FE analysis and experimental.

More »

Fig 16 Expand

Fig 17.

Comparison of parametric analysis of experimental result and finite element simulation for MV60×10.

More »

Fig 17 Expand

Fig 18.

Stress distribution calculating from ABAQUS analysis for one of C-shaped and L-shaped angle connector.

More »

Fig 18 Expand

Fig 19.

Stress contour of C-shaped and L-shaped angle shear connectors.

More »

Fig 19 Expand

Fig 20.

Comparison of concrete damage in FE analyses and the push-out tests.

More »

Fig 20 Expand

Table 3.

Result of finite element analyses for C-shaped angle connectors.

More »

Table 3 Expand