Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

< Back to Article

Table 1.

Patient Demographics: 329 Meniscal Allograft Transplantations in 313 patients.

More »

Table 1 Expand

Fig 1.

Outcomes of meniscal allograft transplantations (MAT).

More »

Fig 1 Expand

Fig 2.

Kaplan-Meier cumulative survivorship of all MAT: endpoint removal of the allograft by total meniscectomy or during conversion to a knee arthroplasty (TKA or UKA).

More »

Fig 2 Expand

Fig 3.

Kaplan-Meier cumulative survivorship of MAT in the <35 years at surgery group—gender: no statistically significant difference between males (blue line) and females (green line) (p = 0.262).

More »

Fig 3 Expand

Fig 4.

Kaplan-Meier cumulative survivorship of MAT in the <35 years at surgery group–lateral/medial: no statistically significant difference between lateral (blue line) and medial (green line) MAT (p = 0.738).

More »

Fig 4 Expand

Fig 5.

Kaplan-Meier cumulative survivorship of MAT in the cartilage Outerbridge grade < III group—gender: no statistically significant difference between males (blue line) and females (green line) (p = 0.901).

More »

Fig 5 Expand

Fig 6.

Kaplan-Meier cumulative survivorship of MAT in the cartilage Outerbridge grade < III group–lateral/medial: no statistically significant difference between lateral (blue line) and medial (green line) MAT (p = 0.591).

More »

Fig 6 Expand

Fig 7.

Kaplan-Meier survivorship curve (blue line) of the best case scenario (age <35 years at surgery and cartilage Outerbridge grade < III: n = 85) versus Kaplan-Meier survivorship curve (red line) of the worst case scenario (Age ≥35 years at surgery and Cartilage Outerbridge grade ≥ III: n = 77).

More »

Fig 7 Expand

Fig 8.

Fit-plot regression curve for evolution of Kellgren-Lawrence grade on consecutive radiographs.

More »

Fig 8 Expand

Fig 9.

Fit-plot regression curve for difference in Kellgren-Lawrence grade on consecutive radiographs over time.

More »

Fig 9 Expand

Fig 10.

Distribution of age versus progression of grade of radiographic OA on the Kellgren-Lawrence scale (+ 0, 1, or 2 grades): no statistically significant difference (p = 0.109).

More »

Fig 10 Expand