Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

< Back to Article

Table 1.

Demographic and clinical profiles of the participants.

More »

Table 1 Expand

Fig 1.

(A) Numbers of images in which subjects made illusory responses in the scene pareidolia test. (B) Numbers of illusory responses in the noise pareidolia test. (C) The pareidolia score. Significance is denoted by an asterisk (Mann-Whitney U test, p < 0.05/3).

More »

Fig 1 Expand

Table 2.

Characteristics of the scene pareidolia test, noise pareidolia test and pareidolia score.

More »

Table 2 Expand

Fig 2.

Receiver Operating Characteristic analysis for the pareidolia test to differentiate DLB from AD.

The areas under the curve (AUCs) were 0.86 for the scene pareidolia test, 0.82 for the noise pareidolia test and 0.92 for the pareidolia score.

More »

Fig 2 Expand

Table 3.

Numbers of patients who scored above or below the cut-off scores on the noise and scene pareidolia tests.

More »

Table 3 Expand

Table 4.

Correlation between the pareidolia test and other clinical variables in DLB patients.

More »

Table 4 Expand