Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

< Back to Article

Fig 1.

Nanosheets characterization for MoS2 dispersions in water.

Fig 1-A, SEM image of vacuum filtrated dispersion onto polycarbonate membrane, Fig 1-B, TEM image of nanosheets, Fig 1-C, AFM image of a nanosheet deposited on silicon wafer with the thickness profile on the inset. Fig 1-D, is a photograph of the dispersion before exfoliation. Fig 1-E, Fig 1-F, and Fig 1-G are the photographs shortly after, 30 days and 4 months after exfoliation respectively.

More »

Fig 1 Expand

Fig 2.

Statistical analysis for the average dimensions of nanosheets.

Fig 2-A, width Fig 2-B, length and Fig 2-C, thickness for 50 nanosheets. The apparent average value is written on the left corner of each histogram.

More »

Fig 2 Expand

Fig 3.

Particle size distribution (PSD) measurements for water dispersion before exfoliation on the left and, after liquid exfoliation on the right.

More »

Fig 3 Expand

Table 1.

Liquid exfoliation (LE) methods for solution processing of MoS2 indicating the solvent used, if surfactant was employed, the final dispersion concentration, exfoliation time, and range or the average lateral nanosheet dimension reported according to AFM or TEM statistical measurements.

More »

Table 1 Expand

Table 2.

A probability decay equation (Eq 1) was applied to the stability data reported by other authors in the referenced papers and the stability data for the present work.

More »

Table 2 Expand

Fig 4.

UV-Vis absorption spectrum for MoS2 dispersion in water.

More »

Fig 4 Expand

Fig 5.

XRD measurements for the dispersion in water vacuum filtrated onto a cellulose membrane, the bulk powder deposited on a silicon wafer, the cellulose membrane filter and the modelling clay used to fix the sample onto the measurement container.

The data for measurements were offset on the vertical axis for clarity. The Miller indexes for each reflexion are indicated for the bulk powder measurement [39].

More »

Fig 5 Expand

Fig 6.

FTIR spectrum for MoS2.

The data for measurements were offset on the vertical axis for clarity.

More »

Fig 6 Expand

Fig 7.

Electrophoretic mobility measurements and estimated zeta potential for water dispersion before exfoliation on the left, dispersion measured right after liquid exfoliation on the middle and, on the right dispersion measured after 30 days of liquid exfoliation.

The number of particles exceeded 1 million on each measurement. The same measurement cell and sample were used for the PSD measurements.

More »

Fig 7 Expand