Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

< Back to Article

Table 1.

A summary of each protocol evaluated during the five experiments.

More »

Table 1 Expand

Table 2.

Macroscopic Lesion Scoring System.

More »

Table 2 Expand

Fig 1.

A summary of each protocol within the five experiments.

The pen designations denote whether animals were housed within the same pen or separate pens and the letters may designate different pens across experiments. The number of feet qualified refers to the number of feet enrolled in each protocol that retained a wrap throughout the length of the study and did not receive topical or systemic antibiotics during the trial period. The induction rate is the percentage of feet that had a macroscopic lesion score of 7 or greater. The brackets denote statistical significance between groups with alpha = .05 and a correction for multiple testing.

More »

Fig 1 Expand

Fig 2.

Lesion Grades for each Macroscopic Lesion Score.

Histopathology score summary from each of the macroscopic scores. As biopsies were only taken from feet with visible lesions, the majority of the lesions scores were 6 or greater. Several lesion scores of 4 and 5 were included in the <6 category. The grade 1 category encompassed all biopsies identified as normal bovine skin. Grade 2 lesions were described as hyperkeratosis, acanthosis with surface hemorrhage and erythrocytic crusts. Grade 3 lesions were described as segmental localized necrotizing to necrosuppurative epidermitis with individual cell necrosis, ballooning degeneration of epithelial cells, necrotizing vasculitis, intralesional bacteria consisting of delicate spirochetes, bacilli, and coccobacilli.

More »

Fig 2 Expand

Fig 3.

Representative DD Lesions from Experiment 5.

Digital Dermatitis lesions on day 28 following wrap removal. Photos A and B represent control calves and photos C and D represent lesions that scored 10 using the induced lesion scoring system.

More »

Fig 3 Expand

Fig 4.

The number of sensitive feet for each day on trial for experiment 5.

Feet were wrapped and abraded on day 0, inoculated on day 3 and wraps were taken off on day 28. The minimum objective measure for a sensitive foot was that a calf held the foot off the ground while standing.

More »

Fig 4 Expand

Table 3.

The Number of Lame Feet for Each of Protocol.

More »

Table 3 Expand

Fig 5.

Grade 3 Digital Dermatitis Histopathologic Changes.

5A shows the characteristic changes of a Grade 3 lesion with necrosis of surface epithelium inflammatory infiltration, ballooning degeneration of epithelial cells, and colonizing bacteria within surface lesions. 5B shows more defined intra-lesional spirochetes within inflammatory loci when stained using W/S silver staining.

More »

Fig 5 Expand