Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

< Back to Article

Fig 1.

Example of degraded face stimuli (neutral; fearful; angry; happy, all 100% emotion intensity) used in the degraded facial affect labeling task.

More »

Fig 1 Expand

Table 1.

Age, sex, and general face recognition performance for each of the four groups.

P values are derived from overall group ANOVA highlighting significant differences across all groups.

More »

Table 1 Expand

Fig 2.

Number of correctly labeled faces (SEM) per emotion, per group.

Asterisks reflect significant differences between groups: black for schizophrenia; grey for BPD.

More »

Fig 2 Expand

Table 2.

Values represent percent misattribution errors for each of the four facial expressions in the degraded facial affect labeling task separated by group, e.g. 5.1% of happy misattributions were due to ‘Happy expressions being mistaken for Angry’ in schizophrenia patients.

Bold values (along the diagonal) represent percent correct for each facial expression by group.

More »

Table 2 Expand