Fig 1.
Phenotypes and physical properties of the S1-24 mutant.
(A) An easily broken culm of S1-24 compared with the wild type. (B) An easily broken flag leaf of S1-24 compared with the wild type. (C, D) Force required to break the first and second upper internodes. (E, F) Elongation length of the first and second upper internodes. Values shown are the averages of values for five internodes. Bars represent standard errors. ** indicate statistical significance by a t test at P < 0.01.
Fig 2.
Pleiotropic phenotypes of the S1-24 mutant.
(A) Gross morphology at the seedling stage (bar = 2 cm). (B) Withering in the flag leaf apex of the S1-24 mutant. (C) Gross morphology at the mature stage (bar = 12 cm). (D) Plant height at the mature stage. (E) Tiller number at the mature stage. (F) Seed setting rate. Values shown are the averages of values for 10 plants. Bars represent standard errors. ** indicates statistical significance by a t test at P < 0.01.
Fig 3.
Cross section of a culm viewed under a scanning electron microscope.
(A, B) Cross section of a wild-type culm. (C, D) Cross section of an S1-24 culm. Magnification in the images is 500× (A, C) or 5000 × (B, D). Green and yellow arrows represented thickened sclerenchyma cell (SC) walls and unthicken parenchyma cell (PC) walls.
Fig 4.
Polysaccharide content of cell walls in the second upper internodes at the heading stage.
Values shown are averages of values for five plants. Bars represent standard errors. ** indicate statistical significance by a t test at P < 0.01.
Fig 5.
Map-based cloning of the gene responsible for the S1-24 phenotype.
(A) The location of the gene locus was narrowed to an approximately 154-kb region on chromosome 10. Vertical lines represent the positions of molecular markers and the number of recombinants. (B) Seventeen predicted ORFs within the fine mapping region. Green, ORFs with known biochemical functions; Yellow, ORFs encoding expressed hypothetical proteins; Black, ORFs encoding transposons. (C) Genomic structure of OsCESA7. Boxes indicate exons. The mutation site is located in the first exon. (D) Protein structure of OsCESA7 including the RING-type zinc finger indicated in blue; two Asp (D) residues, the DXD, Q/RXXRW motifs indicated in red; and eight transmembrane domains indicated in yellow. Tos17 insertion sites in the NC0259 and ND8759 mutants allelic to the S1-24 mutant are indicated by arrows. (E) Alignment of zinc finger motif template and the corresponding OsCESA7 region. The site of the mutation C40 is highly conserved.
Fig 6.
Phenotypes of genetic complementation in transgenic S1-24 mutant plants.
(A) Gross morphologies of wild-type, S1-24, and R1 and R2 complementation lines at the mature stage. (B) Resistance to breakage in culms of the R1 and R2 complementation lines compared with S1-24 and wild-type culms.
Fig 7.
RT-PCR analysis of OsCESA7 expression.
(A) Semiquantitative RT-PCR analysis of OsCESA9 expression. (B) Real-time RT-PCR analysis of OsCESA7 expression. Total RNA was extracted from leaf sheaths, leaf blades, and roots at the seedling stage and from culms and panicles at the mature stage of wild-type plants. The rice ACTIN1 gene was used as a control for equal loading. Values shown are averages of four replicates. Bars represent standard errors.
Fig 8.
Expression pattern of OsCESA7 revealed by GUS-staining in OsCESA7promoter: GUS transgenic plants.
(A) A segment of leaf blade. (B) Leaf blade cross section. (C) Magnified image of the root. (D) Leaf sheath. (E) Leaf sheath cross section. (F) Spikelet. (G) Stem. (H) Stem cross section. Signals were detected in vascular bundles, especially in sclerenchyma cells.
Fig 9.
The site of the mutation in the S1-24 mutant and phylogenetic analysis of OsCESA7.
(A) Multiple alignments of the N-terminal region of 11 members of the OsCESA family and 8 members of the AtCESA family. The mutated residue (cysteine 40) is highly conserved. (B) Phylogenetic analysis of CESAs. The scale bar is an indicator of genetic distance based on branch length.