Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

< Back to Article

Table 1.

Characteristics of raters familiar (1 to 6) and less familiar (7 to12) with the MUNIX method.

# = number.

More »

Table 1 Expand

Fig 1.

A and B: Test-retest results for MUNIX (A) and CMAP (mV) (B) in individual muscles. The dotted lines indicate the hypothetical reference value. Note the different y-axis scales for each muscle. Open dots = test values, filled dots = retest values.

More »

Fig 1 Expand

Table 2.

Coefficient of variation (COV) and variability () for MUNIX measurements in individual muscles in raters.

More »

Table 2 Expand

Table 3.

Inter-rater variability (COV) in individual muscles for the first and second measurement and mean of both values.

More »

Table 3 Expand

Fig 2.

Relative mean and standard deviation of MUNIX and CMAP measurements in individual muscles of the experienced group (filled circles) and less-experienced group (empty circles) compared to the hypothetical reference values, expressed as accuracy (%).

More »

Fig 2 Expand

Table 4.

Descriptive results of MUNIX and CMAP measurements in different rater groups.

More »

Table 4 Expand

Fig 3.

Correlation between duration of measurements and maximum stimulus intensity for all 6 muscles.

More »

Fig 3 Expand