Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

< Back to Article

Fig 1.

Dentin Specimens.

(A) Schematic diagram of the embedment on the mounting plate.(B) The specimens were fixed in custom-made appliances in the brushing machine.

More »

Fig 1 Expand

Fig 2.

Dr. Best High-Deep, hard, at 300x and 117x magnification (white and color filaments).

More »

Fig 2 Expand

Fig 3.

Dr. Best High-Deep, medium at 300x and 117x magnification (white and color filaments).

More »

Fig 3 Expand

Fig 4.

Dr. Best High-Deep, soft, at 300x and 117x magnification (white and color filaments).

More »

Fig 4 Expand

Fig 5.

Study design.

More »

Fig 5 Expand

Fig 6.

Measurements of step height.

More »

Fig 6 Expand

Fig 7.

Dentin loss (μm) for different toothbrush types within the AE, A, and E groups.

Horizontal bars are indicating statistically significant differences within groups (EA, A) for hard, medium, and soft bristles, * p < 0.02, Mann-Whitney U-test) as well as between groups (n.s., not significant; *p < 0.05; ** p < 0.01; ***p < 0.001, Mann-Whitney U-test).

More »

Fig 7 Expand

Table 1.

Median (25th and 75th percentiles) Dentin loss after 6300 strokes (μm).

More »

Table 1 Expand

Fig 8.

Scatterplot of the relationship between step height and data on erosion and abrasion.

More »

Fig 8 Expand