Fig 1.
CHARM Consort Figure.
Table 1.
Intervention modules and delivery schedule.
Table 2.
Characteristics of CHARM participants for the total sample and by treatment condition (N = 1081 couples).
Table 3.
Simple main effects for adjusted logistic GLMM assessing effects of CHARM intervention on modern contraceptive use, contraceptive communication, and pregnancy; per intent to treat (N = 1081 couples).
Table 4.
Simple main effects for adjusted logistic GLMM assessing effects of CHARM intervention on modern contraceptive use, contraceptive communication, and pregnancy; by actual session participation (N = 1081 couples).
Table 5.
Simple main effects for logistic GLMM assessing effect of CHARM intervention on physical IPV, sexual IPV, and men’s attitudes of acceptability towards physical IPV and sexual IPV; per intent to treat (N = 1081 couples).
Table 6.
Simple main effects for logistic GLMM assessing effect of CHARM intervention on physical IPV, sexual IPV, and men’s attitudes of acceptability towards physical IPV and sexual IPV; by actual session participation (N = 1081 couples).
Table 7.
Male Participant Experiences of CHARM Intervention Delivery and Satisfaction with the Program (n = 347 men who participated in at least one CHARM session).