Table 1.
Descriptive statistics (mean ± SD).
Table 2.
Correlation between skinfolds and ultrasound at each measurement site, for each trial, by both technicians.
Table 3.
Means ± SD (mm) for each skinfold and ultrasound measurement site, for each trial, measured by each technician.
Table 4.
Body fat percentages (%BF) from the three methods (mean ± SD) for each trial by each technician.
Fig 1.
Relationship between estimated body fat percentage (%BF) from ultrasound and skinfold for technician 1 (a) and technician 2 (b). Solid line represents the line of identity and dashed line is the regression line.
Fig 2.
Relationship between estimated body fat percentage (%BF) from ultrasound and from the Bod Pod.
Solid line represents the line of identity and dashed line is the regression line.
Fig 3.
Bland-Altman analysis of the residual scores.
Solid line is the constant error and the dashed lines are ± 2 SD.