Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

< Back to Article

Table 1.

Summary of standard gamble and rating scale.

More »

Table 1 Expand

Fig 1.

A flow diagram of the methodological steps involved in the study.

More »

Fig 1 Expand

Table 2.

Demographic and clinical characteristics of the Development and the Validation sample.

More »

Table 2 Expand

Table 3.

Mean rating scale and standard gamble values derived from the development sample.

More »

Table 3 Expand

Fig 2.

RS values by quantiles for PBMSI corner states in the development sample.

More »

Fig 2 Expand

Fig 3.

SG values by quantiles for PBMSI corner states in the development sample.

More »

Fig 3 Expand

Table 4.

Concordance between the levels of difficulty between the RS and the SG in the development sample.

More »

Table 4 Expand

Table 5.

Calculation of parameters in the estimation of the PBMSI MAUFD in the Development sample.

More »

Table 5 Expand

Table 6.

PBMSI MAUFD developed based on standard gamble values obtained from the Development sample.

More »

Table 6 Expand

Table 7.

PBMSI MAUFD developed based on rating scale values obtained from the Development sample.

More »

Table 7 Expand

Fig 4.

Scatter plot to assess agreement between the SG MAUFD and the RS MAUFD for the development sample.

More »

Fig 4 Expand

Fig 5.

Bland-Altman plot to assess agreement between the SG MAUFD and the RS MAUFD in the development sample.

More »

Fig 5 Expand

Fig 6.

Scatter plot to assess agreement between the SG MAUFV and the RS MAUFV for the validation sample.

More »

Fig 6 Expand

Fig 7.

Bland-Altman plot to assess agreement between the SG MAUFV and the RS MAUFV in the validation sample.

More »

Fig 7 Expand

Table 8.

Known-groups validity of the PBMSI and the EQ-5D index against external measures of disease severity in the validation sample.

More »

Table 8 Expand