Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

< Back to Article

Table 1.

Structure and content of the physical activity questionnaires (PASBAQ and Short-form IPAQ) used in HSE 2012.

More »

Table 1 Expand

Table 2.

Derivation of summary variables (PASBAQ and IPAQ) used in HSE 2012.

More »

Table 2 Expand

Table 3.

Characteristics of participants in the Health Survey for England 2012 by sample type (PASBAQ without IPAQ and PASBAQ with IPAQ).

More »

Table 3 Expand

Fig 1.

Relationships between PASBAQ and IPAQ assessed MVPA for men (left panel) and women (right panel).

Solid line represents the fitted linear regression line; dotted line represents the 45 degree line of equality (indicating perfect agreement). Pearson (r) and concordance (Pc) correlation coefficients shown.

More »

Fig 1 Expand

Fig 2.

Relationships between PASBAQ and IPAQ assessed time spent sitting on weekdays for men (left panel) and women (right panel).

Solid line represents the fitted linear regression line; dotted line represents the 45 degree line of equality (indicating perfect agreement). Pearson (r) and concordance (Pc) correlation coefficients shown.

More »

Fig 2 Expand

Fig 3.

Prevalence of sufficient aerobic activity, inactivity, and excessive sitting according to the PASBAQ and Short-form IPAQ.

Proportion of participants categorised as: (1) sufficiently aerobically active (moderate-to-vigorous physical activity [MVPA] ≥150minutes/week), 2) inactive (MVPA <30minutes/week), and 3) sedentary (sitting ≥540minutes/weekday) according to the Physical Activity and Sedentary Behaviour Assessment Questionnaire (PASBAQ) and Short-form International Physical Activity Questionnaire (IPAQ) across groups stratified by gender, age-group, income, resting pulse rate (RHR), and BMI category.

More »

Fig 3 Expand

Table 4.

Kappa statistic and 95% CI, and the prevalence-adjusted bias-adjusted Kappa (PABAK) statistic for PASBAQ- and IPAQ-based estimates of sufficient aerobic activity, inactivity, and excessive sitting.

More »

Table 4 Expand

Table 5.

Percentage agreement and weighted Kappa coefficients for PASBAQ- and IPAQ-based tertiles of MVPA and of sitting.

More »

Table 5 Expand

Fig 4.

Prevalence of health outcomes according to the PASBAQ- and Short-form IPAQ-assessed tertiles of time spent in MVPA for men (top panel) and women (lower panel).

Proportion of participants categorised with physical health and mental health outcomes according to the Physical Activity and Sedentary Behaviour Assessment Questionnaire (PASBAQ) and Short-form International Physical Activity Questionnaire (IPAQ) assessed tertiles of time spent in Moderate to Vigorous Physical Activity (MVPA).

More »

Fig 4 Expand

Fig 5.

Associations of PASBAQ- and IPAQ-assessed time spent in MVPA with odds of unfavourable health outcomes for men (top panel) and women (lower panel).

The odds ratios (and 95% CI) shown in Table 6 are shown in graphical form. The estimates compare participants in: (1) the middle tertile of MVPA vs. the lowest tertile of MVPA (dark grey), and (2) the highest tertile of MVPA vs. the lowest tertile of MVPA (light grey), grouped by health outcome.

More »

Fig 5 Expand

Table 6.

Associations of PASBAQ- and IPAQ-assessed time spent in moderate-to-vigorous intensity physical activity with odds of unfavourable health outcomes.

More »

Table 6 Expand

Fig 6.

Prevalence of health outcomes according to the PASBAQ- and Short-form IPAQ-assessed tertiles of time spent sitting for men (top panel) and for women (lower panel).

Proportion of participants categorised with physical health and mental health outcomes according to the Physical Activity and Sedentary Behaviour Assessment Questionnaire (PASBAQ) and Short-form International Physical Activity Questionnaire (IPAQ) assessed tertiles of time spent sitting on weekdays.

More »

Fig 6 Expand

Fig 7.

Associations of PASBAQ- and IPAQ-assessed time spent sitting with odds of unfavourable health outcomes for men (top panel) and women (lower panel).

The odds ratios (and 95% CI) shown in Table 7 are shown in graphical form. The estimates compare participants in: (1) the middle tertile of sitting time vs. lowest tertile of sitting time (dark grey), and (2) the highest tertile of sitting time vs. lowest tertile of sitting time (light grey), grouped by health outcome.

More »

Fig 7 Expand

Table 7.

Associations of PASBAQ- and IPAQ-assessed time spent sitting on weekdays with odds of unfavourable health outcomes.

More »

Table 7 Expand